Not sure about specific place of bleeding. However, here is what being mentioned for Mebendazole (which is somewhat similar to Fenbendazole) in regards to bleeding:
“Mebendazole may cause serious side effects. Call your doctor at once if you have:
signs of bone marrow suppression--sudden weakness or ill feeling, fever, chills, sore throat, mouth sores, red or swollen gums, trouble swallowing, easy bruising or bleeding; or
severe skin reaction--swelling in your face or tongue; sores around your eyes, nose, mouth, or genitals; hives or skin rash that spreads and causes blistering and peeling.”
Also wanted to add that cancerous tissue can bleed on its own regardless of treatment. If stopping Fenbendazole doesn’t resolve bleeding problem, it needs to be addressed with the doctor.
These are the paragons of science that brought us through the recent plague with what may end up as the biggest malfeasance in medical mafia history.; the safe and effective crowd.
Yes, we've seen this article. We'll pick it apart in a future Substack but let's just say the other side had better up their game. Gorski actually supports the claim that fenbendazole does eradicate cancer. The data out of the Riggins' lab at Hopkins is indisputable and the Case Reports here, and elsewhere, are the Community Trials proving the concept in humans that no drug company will every perform. We laughed out loud when Gorski claimed that Joe Tippins' cancer was actually cured by Keytruda, not fenbendazole, ignoring the fact that out of 1100 other keytruda trial subjects that Tippins was the only survivor. We've also seen where the medical community has also claimed that Tippins didn't have lung cancer but actually was misdiagnosed actually having parasites which is why fenbendazole worked. So which is it? They should rehearse their lies so that they get their stories straight before they embarrass themselves again.
Also, for those who have read G Edward Griffin's, A World Without Cancer, The Story of Vitamin B17 (Laetrile)--all about Laetrile and the "scientific" smear campaign there, just like with early Covid Treatments and long Covid/long Vax treatments--we see this clearly as more of the same! And that they would be so audacious as to use their squashing of Laetrile as "proof" that Fenben is in the same category! Well, it is, in that it actually works, as Laetrile was for hundreds of cancer sufferers. Talk about Gaslighting! And for those who haven't read Griffin's book, here is an excellent excerpt from it which summarizes the history of the "Let's crush Fenben, uh, scratch that, Let's crush Laetrile" game.
Just read gorski’s article. He makes a convincing argument for fenbendazole as a low risk, high reward alternative cancer treatment. It may not be effective for every situation, which no one has ever claimed, but fenbendazole is effective with many cancers.
Is there any research, anecdotal or otherwise, for a recommended prophylactic dosage of Fenben? I’ve read different recommendations, I think some — and I’m talking pre-cancerous, like an enlarged prostate for example —222 mg 3x / week? I doubt it would be daily, as that’s what a lot of people take to cure their cancer. That, FB 3x/wk +12 mg of ivermectin several times a week or daily (IVM has been shown to reduce or cure prostate cancer) seems good. Thoughts?
By the way, as Ben Fen has written we are all having to do these medical experiments on ourselves to discover what dosages work because the powers that ought not be will not fund something from which they cannot rake in billions —and I would add, for something that will not make us sicker and eventually dead (pop control). So, interestingly enough, FLCCC in their weekly update 2/28, Drs Marik & Kory were saying the most trustworthy or valuable research is turning out to be the practical boots on the ground anecdotal research versus what is considered “the gold standard” RCTs (randomized controlled trials) because just being peer-reviewed ,often by those in the pockets of big Pharma, really doesn’t mean much…
And I’ve read others in the field stating some research had been done that revealed 85% of research papers are fraudulent or partly fraudulent… So where is one to go except to what is actually working boots on the ground from we poor souls who are trying to get well? OK rabbit trail …
Good question regarding fenbendazole for cancer prevention. Been thinking about this recently and given the Riggins preclinical data showing that fenbendazole (mebendazole) prevents the establishment of tumors it looks like fenben can also prevent cancer. However, there is a fine theoretical line between prevention and eradication (cure). For example, since fenben disrupts the microtubule system of the cancer cell (among other mechanisms) it is correct to say that fenben eradicates existing cancer cells. However, does fenben correct (eradicate) the process leading to the production of that cancer cell that eventually takes on a life of its own? Classic chicken and egg problem. To get back to the question of taking fenben for prevention; if prevention is the snuffing out of nascent cancer cells that become tumors then, yes, fenben is a preventative. To "cure", fix or remove the issue that is causing that cell to become cancerous in the first place (be it genetic, environmental or other), then, no, fenben is not likely to be preventative at that level.
Thank you, Ben Fen. Excellent differentiation there. Looking at FLCCC Cancer Care, https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Cancer-Care-2024-03-05.pdf , p. 62, highlighting the 15 or so pathways Meben/Fenben block and destroy cancer, I honed in on TME. If I remember correctly that's Tumor Metabolic Environment, even that gets tweaked so cancer cannot proliferate and survive. But like you said, what is at the root in the physiology of the host that made the nascent cancer cells even have a possibility? Many of us, vaxxed or not, (NOT!) are so spiked out, hence inflamed and bio compromised in so many ways, that that alone creates a hellacious haven for cancer... turbo cancers... So what would be a good prophylactic for a hubby who has enlarged prostate, relatively low PSA (4. something...) 3x / wk @ 222 ? Taking IVM at 12mg (also for long covid)...
I know my question is not related to this article, but i need to know what an adult dosage should be on the ivermectin IP iveractin tablets 12mg should be when i want to take it to soften the side effects on a "cold"? At one stage in life on another planet we could get our hands on human ivermectin medicine, but it seems even the pharmacists are not willing to give answers on dosage. And i still don't know or even are allowed to know which drs do treat us this way. Should i still take dazzit with it?
Yeah, it’s POINT 2 (.2) mg/kg or .4 or .6 depending on what it is you’re treating or dealing with. If you go to FLCCC Alliance under Resources , Treatment Strategies, they have the protocols and recommended dosages of IVM for whether you’re infected with something, or if you’ve been exposed, or if you’re dealing with Long VAX or Long Covid or if you’re fighting cancer… ;)
Ivermectin doseage is weight based. The dose is 2 mg per kilogram of bodyweight. However if someone is sick and has comorbidities, the dose is 4 to 6 mg per kilogram of bodyweight. If I feel like I'm catching a cold or feel like I might be coming down with something, I take a dose of 12 or 15 mgs. I weigh 130lbs. By the next day I feel fine.
Follow up to my post below, figuring out which form of FB to use predominantly. The powder, by far the most economical, especially at Fenbenlab.com , appears to be the most bioavailable (over capsules and tablets), esp. if stirred via toothpick in 2 tsp or 1 TB of EVOO. HOWEVER, I just tried this and it is a bear to work with!! because the FB powder is so fine and light weight (like talcum powder) that it wants to fly everywhere, even if one is very careful. AND a plastic scoop was included which only makes the powder more static (I know, use my own 1/8 metal tsp for 225mg). Sprinkling on the food has been suggested... But I'd have to lick the plate to get all those precious bits of barely visible powder spread all over... LOL! Would like to hear from any of you who are using the powder.
Since Fenbendazole floats on top of liquids, just dump it on top of anything you eat with a spoon and spoon it up. I've always taken it on top of my oatmeal in the morning. It sets on top and I scoop it up. FWIW- I always melt a tablespoon of butter in the oatmeal as a fat source.
Thanks, Lee. I'll try that, but I'll wait til half way through my meal or toward the end of it, as some have suggested. It provides more fat/food already in the stomach to cocoon the Fenben with its little fatty haven of absorption. :-)
I have a question (rephrased a few ways) that would help me make arguments about fenbendazole. Is there any known contraindication? Is there any risk of toxicity? Are there any known interactions?
Right now it seems like a no-brainer to me for any person diagnosed with cancer to immediately start taking some reasonable daily dose of fenbendazole. But is there any known reason that doing this might be harmful?
No. Actually Riggins’ lab at Hopkins has demonstrated that fenbendazole can potentiate/enhance the cancer killing effects of radiation and some chemotherapies.
No. Actually Riggins’ lab at Hopkins has demonstrated that fenbendazole can potentiate/enhance the cancer killing effects of radiation and some chemotherapies.
I was curious as to the varying bioavailability of the form of Fenben. I simply did a quick search on the net, and although healthline is in with the medical industrial complex (as far as I can tell), they seem to be straightforward about the pros and cons of tablets in general compared to capsules. See link below. Capsules are more readily and quickly dissolved and absorbed. They tend to be a bit more pricey and cannot contain as high of mg of the drug as tablets. Tablets are much less expensive, do not break up uniformly once ingested and can cause more stomach upset (check me on this, I sped read once). But it was enough to answer my question posed elsewhere on this site.
Fenben is fat soluble, and in some of the Fenben info its emphasized downside is a lack of bioavailability. Therefore there is frequent recommendation to take with EVO.
So with all that, it would appear that: Best bioavailability: 1) fenben powder (with meal, partially dissolved in EVO, I use 2 tsp), 2) fenben caps swallowed toward end of meal with 2 tsp EVO, 3) tablets taken toward end of meal and chewed on with 2 tsp EVO (or highly fatty food) and then swallowed. You can pre crush if preferred, but husband did not note any bitter taste.
Some recommend 1 Tb EVO. That's a lot if you choose to divide fenben in 2 different dosages of 222 ea (as I was). Now I just take 444mg capsules in one sitting with a meal that has some fat and I figure 2 tsp EVO is enough. One pharmacist recommended taking fenben w/ 1 tsp butter.
Paul Ellis Marik (born March 26, 1958) is a medical doctor and former professor of medicine. Until his resignation in January 2022, he served as the chair of the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine at Eastern Virginia Medical School in Norfolk, Virginia. Additionally, he worked as a critical care doctor at Sentara Norfolk General Hospital. His research interests include sepsis and tissue oxygenation1.
Dr. Marik is known for developing the “Marik protocol” (also referred to as the “HAT” protocol), which was a treatment for preventing sepsis. However, this protocol has since been discredited1. He is also a co-leader of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC), which has advocated for the use of the anti-parasitic drug ivermectin to treat COVID-19, despite advice to the contrary from leading health agencies1. Dr. Marik has described himself as a "status quo destabilizer"1.
Born in Johannesburg, South Africa, Dr. Marik earned a Master of Medicine in the Specialty of Internal Medicine from the University of the Witwatersrand. He has worked in teaching hospitals in the United States since 1992 and authored the Handbook of Evidence-Based Critical Care in 20011. Although his career has been marked by controversy, his contributions to critical care medicine continue to be a topic of discussion in the medical community.
There are many studies indicating cancer is actually parasites and that is why anti-parasitics can be beneficial in treating cancer. No one wants to talk about this but thought I would share. Thank you for bringing up this amazing treatment option for people with cancer.
We'd say that cancer acts like a parasite, in contrast to those that claim cancer is caused by parasites. So, yes, we're on the same page as you in your thinking.
What part of a teaspoon is this? My guess is one fifth. 222 is nice number ( https://www.bing.com/search?q=222+is+nice+number&PC=U316&FORM=CHROMN ) and this what the classic dog dewormer has. That 222 mg Joe Tippens used. These days some take double this dose daily. Joe took this 5x per week, iirc.
Found At Amazon That Joe Tippens used >>> "Panacur C Canine Dewormer (Fenbendazole), 4 Gram,Red"
FYI: FLCCCC on Feb 7 on their Rumble channel broadcasted their weekly update, this one on "Health Care Revolution Conference Recap." And Dr Paul Marik shared an update to one of his slides he had shared at the conference. "Metabolic Interventions to Control Cancer," at 25:40 minute mark: ON THE MEBENDAZOLE (sadly, only 100-200mg) ITEM, IVERMECTIN 12 MG WAS ADDED RIGHT NEXT TO IT, NOW IN TIER 1, AND IN THE TOP 10 AT THAT! Last I looked, his conference slide had not yet been updated to include Ivermectin. BUT in his 12/11/23 update to his Cancer Care book, Ivermectin had been upgraded to Tier 2, and he had commented there (and in the Mebendazole section) that the two would act synergistically together, with one caveat: Ivermectin does not cross the BBB (blood brain barrier) and so would not be helpful for brain cancer. He seems to put Mebendazole/Fenbendazole on par in his hard copy of the book. I hope they're the same, I just ordered a significant amount of Mebendazole from India.
While it is true that Ivermectin doesn't cross the BBB in most mammals, it might be worth taking (along with Fenbendazole) for gliomas. A few articles I have read mention the different pathways IVM uses to kill glioma cancer cells.
Thank you, T! :-) Yes, I’ve read about the mechanisms by which IVM works against cancers, and thank you for bringing it to my attention that it appears to somehow work against gliomas—and yet, in these papers you linked to in their describing these mechanisms upon the glioma cell itself in vitro and in vivo, it’s never specified how it gets through the BBB to the glioma in the brain!!… hmmm? And then at the end of the NIH article the authors state: however, because IVM does not cross the BBB the outlook for IVM’s effectiveness against gliomas is not optimistic.
So it’s a mixed bag… but you know what? I have not stopped taking my 12 mg of IVM every day!! along with a mix of Fenben and Meben. Since I have both and have read several research papers on each of them,
I’m using half-and-half mgs of each per day , or alternating days (fenben then meben, totaling 425mg day). Thus covering all my bets to beat down the CSM in my brain… along with a whole boatload of supplements!! Ugh!
Wondering if anyone has had an experience wherein the Fenbendazole causes bleeding in the colon, while eliminating the cancerous tissue?
Not sure about specific place of bleeding. However, here is what being mentioned for Mebendazole (which is somewhat similar to Fenbendazole) in regards to bleeding:
https://www.drugs.com/mtm/mebendazole.html#side-effects
“Mebendazole may cause serious side effects. Call your doctor at once if you have:
signs of bone marrow suppression--sudden weakness or ill feeling, fever, chills, sore throat, mouth sores, red or swollen gums, trouble swallowing, easy bruising or bleeding; or
severe skin reaction--swelling in your face or tongue; sores around your eyes, nose, mouth, or genitals; hives or skin rash that spreads and causes blistering and peeling.”
Also wanted to add that cancerous tissue can bleed on its own regardless of treatment. If stopping Fenbendazole doesn’t resolve bleeding problem, it needs to be addressed with the doctor.
Thank you for that!
Well, as usual the gatekeepers must trot out their autocratic declarations of superiority.
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/fenbendazole-is-fast-becoming-the-laetrile-of-the-2020s/
These are the paragons of science that brought us through the recent plague with what may end up as the biggest malfeasance in medical mafia history.; the safe and effective crowd.
https://swprs.org/covid19-facts/
Follow the money, find the science (Fauci, Redfield, et al)
Yes, we've seen this article. We'll pick it apart in a future Substack but let's just say the other side had better up their game. Gorski actually supports the claim that fenbendazole does eradicate cancer. The data out of the Riggins' lab at Hopkins is indisputable and the Case Reports here, and elsewhere, are the Community Trials proving the concept in humans that no drug company will every perform. We laughed out loud when Gorski claimed that Joe Tippins' cancer was actually cured by Keytruda, not fenbendazole, ignoring the fact that out of 1100 other keytruda trial subjects that Tippins was the only survivor. We've also seen where the medical community has also claimed that Tippins didn't have lung cancer but actually was misdiagnosed actually having parasites which is why fenbendazole worked. So which is it? They should rehearse their lies so that they get their stories straight before they embarrass themselves again.
Also, for those who have read G Edward Griffin's, A World Without Cancer, The Story of Vitamin B17 (Laetrile)--all about Laetrile and the "scientific" smear campaign there, just like with early Covid Treatments and long Covid/long Vax treatments--we see this clearly as more of the same! And that they would be so audacious as to use their squashing of Laetrile as "proof" that Fenben is in the same category! Well, it is, in that it actually works, as Laetrile was for hundreds of cancer sufferers. Talk about Gaslighting! And for those who haven't read Griffin's book, here is an excellent excerpt from it which summarizes the history of the "Let's crush Fenben, uh, scratch that, Let's crush Laetrile" game.
http://www.jaegerresearchinstitute.org/articles/laetrile.htm
And here is the pdf of the book:
https://pdfroom.com/books/world-without-cancer/avd94BM85KD
LOL!!!
Just read gorski’s article. He makes a convincing argument for fenbendazole as a low risk, high reward alternative cancer treatment. It may not be effective for every situation, which no one has ever claimed, but fenbendazole is effective with many cancers.
I like the name of the website; science based medicine. HA HA HA HA HA HA, that’s funny.
After looking at this site further, yes. 😂
“Acupuncture is a pre-scientific superstition”. 🤦♀️
Is there any research, anecdotal or otherwise, for a recommended prophylactic dosage of Fenben? I’ve read different recommendations, I think some — and I’m talking pre-cancerous, like an enlarged prostate for example —222 mg 3x / week? I doubt it would be daily, as that’s what a lot of people take to cure their cancer. That, FB 3x/wk +12 mg of ivermectin several times a week or daily (IVM has been shown to reduce or cure prostate cancer) seems good. Thoughts?
By the way, as Ben Fen has written we are all having to do these medical experiments on ourselves to discover what dosages work because the powers that ought not be will not fund something from which they cannot rake in billions —and I would add, for something that will not make us sicker and eventually dead (pop control). So, interestingly enough, FLCCC in their weekly update 2/28, Drs Marik & Kory were saying the most trustworthy or valuable research is turning out to be the practical boots on the ground anecdotal research versus what is considered “the gold standard” RCTs (randomized controlled trials) because just being peer-reviewed ,often by those in the pockets of big Pharma, really doesn’t mean much…
And I’ve read others in the field stating some research had been done that revealed 85% of research papers are fraudulent or partly fraudulent… So where is one to go except to what is actually working boots on the ground from we poor souls who are trying to get well? OK rabbit trail …
Good question regarding fenbendazole for cancer prevention. Been thinking about this recently and given the Riggins preclinical data showing that fenbendazole (mebendazole) prevents the establishment of tumors it looks like fenben can also prevent cancer. However, there is a fine theoretical line between prevention and eradication (cure). For example, since fenben disrupts the microtubule system of the cancer cell (among other mechanisms) it is correct to say that fenben eradicates existing cancer cells. However, does fenben correct (eradicate) the process leading to the production of that cancer cell that eventually takes on a life of its own? Classic chicken and egg problem. To get back to the question of taking fenben for prevention; if prevention is the snuffing out of nascent cancer cells that become tumors then, yes, fenben is a preventative. To "cure", fix or remove the issue that is causing that cell to become cancerous in the first place (be it genetic, environmental or other), then, no, fenben is not likely to be preventative at that level.
Thank you, Ben Fen. Excellent differentiation there. Looking at FLCCC Cancer Care, https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Cancer-Care-2024-03-05.pdf , p. 62, highlighting the 15 or so pathways Meben/Fenben block and destroy cancer, I honed in on TME. If I remember correctly that's Tumor Metabolic Environment, even that gets tweaked so cancer cannot proliferate and survive. But like you said, what is at the root in the physiology of the host that made the nascent cancer cells even have a possibility? Many of us, vaxxed or not, (NOT!) are so spiked out, hence inflamed and bio compromised in so many ways, that that alone creates a hellacious haven for cancer... turbo cancers... So what would be a good prophylactic for a hubby who has enlarged prostate, relatively low PSA (4. something...) 3x / wk @ 222 ? Taking IVM at 12mg (also for long covid)...
Thanks! I would love to see that study or studies. Do you happen to have a link?
Thank you for these posts on how Fenbendazole helps heal people. So important.
I know my question is not related to this article, but i need to know what an adult dosage should be on the ivermectin IP iveractin tablets 12mg should be when i want to take it to soften the side effects on a "cold"? At one stage in life on another planet we could get our hands on human ivermectin medicine, but it seems even the pharmacists are not willing to give answers on dosage. And i still don't know or even are allowed to know which drs do treat us this way. Should i still take dazzit with it?
Yeah, it’s POINT 2 (.2) mg/kg or .4 or .6 depending on what it is you’re treating or dealing with. If you go to FLCCC Alliance under Resources , Treatment Strategies, they have the protocols and recommended dosages of IVM for whether you’re infected with something, or if you’ve been exposed, or if you’re dealing with Long VAX or Long Covid or if you’re fighting cancer… ;)
Ivermectin doseage is weight based. The dose is 2 mg per kilogram of bodyweight. However if someone is sick and has comorbidities, the dose is 4 to 6 mg per kilogram of bodyweight. If I feel like I'm catching a cold or feel like I might be coming down with something, I take a dose of 12 or 15 mgs. I weigh 130lbs. By the next day I feel fine.
Follow up to my post below, figuring out which form of FB to use predominantly. The powder, by far the most economical, especially at Fenbenlab.com , appears to be the most bioavailable (over capsules and tablets), esp. if stirred via toothpick in 2 tsp or 1 TB of EVOO. HOWEVER, I just tried this and it is a bear to work with!! because the FB powder is so fine and light weight (like talcum powder) that it wants to fly everywhere, even if one is very careful. AND a plastic scoop was included which only makes the powder more static (I know, use my own 1/8 metal tsp for 225mg). Sprinkling on the food has been suggested... But I'd have to lick the plate to get all those precious bits of barely visible powder spread all over... LOL! Would like to hear from any of you who are using the powder.
Since Fenbendazole floats on top of liquids, just dump it on top of anything you eat with a spoon and spoon it up. I've always taken it on top of my oatmeal in the morning. It sets on top and I scoop it up. FWIW- I always melt a tablespoon of butter in the oatmeal as a fat source.
Thanks, Lee. I'll try that, but I'll wait til half way through my meal or toward the end of it, as some have suggested. It provides more fat/food already in the stomach to cocoon the Fenben with its little fatty haven of absorption. :-)
I have a question (rephrased a few ways) that would help me make arguments about fenbendazole. Is there any known contraindication? Is there any risk of toxicity? Are there any known interactions?
Right now it seems like a no-brainer to me for any person diagnosed with cancer to immediately start taking some reasonable daily dose of fenbendazole. But is there any known reason that doing this might be harmful?
No. Actually Riggins’ lab at Hopkins has demonstrated that fenbendazole can potentiate/enhance the cancer killing effects of radiation and some chemotherapies.
No. Actually Riggins’ lab at Hopkins has demonstrated that fenbendazole can potentiate/enhance the cancer killing effects of radiation and some chemotherapies.
I was curious as to the varying bioavailability of the form of Fenben. I simply did a quick search on the net, and although healthline is in with the medical industrial complex (as far as I can tell), they seem to be straightforward about the pros and cons of tablets in general compared to capsules. See link below. Capsules are more readily and quickly dissolved and absorbed. They tend to be a bit more pricey and cannot contain as high of mg of the drug as tablets. Tablets are much less expensive, do not break up uniformly once ingested and can cause more stomach upset (check me on this, I sped read once). But it was enough to answer my question posed elsewhere on this site.
Fenben is fat soluble, and in some of the Fenben info its emphasized downside is a lack of bioavailability. Therefore there is frequent recommendation to take with EVO.
So with all that, it would appear that: Best bioavailability: 1) fenben powder (with meal, partially dissolved in EVO, I use 2 tsp), 2) fenben caps swallowed toward end of meal with 2 tsp EVO, 3) tablets taken toward end of meal and chewed on with 2 tsp EVO (or highly fatty food) and then swallowed. You can pre crush if preferred, but husband did not note any bitter taste.
Some recommend 1 Tb EVO. That's a lot if you choose to divide fenben in 2 different dosages of 222 ea (as I was). Now I just take 444mg capsules in one sitting with a meal that has some fat and I figure 2 tsp EVO is enough. One pharmacist recommended taking fenben w/ 1 tsp butter.
Caps vs Tabs:
https://www.healthline.com/health/capsule-vs-tablet
THE ROLE OF REPURPOSED DRUGS AND METABOLIC INTERVENTIONS IN TREATING CANCER
Paul E. Marik, MD, FCCM, FCCP
(He covers fenbendazole. Calls it First Tier. / ivermectin too. He calls it second tier)
This is a visually slick production with color illustrations and charts.
Free download.
https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Cancer-Care-2023-12-11.pdf
____________________________
More Paul E. Marik material and his videos (This man is serious!)
https://covid19criticalcare.com/reviews-and-monographs/cancer-care/
____________________________
He even gets endorsed by Bing AI search! *****
Paul Ellis Marik (born March 26, 1958) is a medical doctor and former professor of medicine. Until his resignation in January 2022, he served as the chair of the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine at Eastern Virginia Medical School in Norfolk, Virginia. Additionally, he worked as a critical care doctor at Sentara Norfolk General Hospital. His research interests include sepsis and tissue oxygenation1.
Dr. Marik is known for developing the “Marik protocol” (also referred to as the “HAT” protocol), which was a treatment for preventing sepsis. However, this protocol has since been discredited1. He is also a co-leader of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC), which has advocated for the use of the anti-parasitic drug ivermectin to treat COVID-19, despite advice to the contrary from leading health agencies1. Dr. Marik has described himself as a "status quo destabilizer"1.
Born in Johannesburg, South Africa, Dr. Marik earned a Master of Medicine in the Specialty of Internal Medicine from the University of the Witwatersrand. He has worked in teaching hospitals in the United States since 1992 and authored the Handbook of Evidence-Based Critical Care in 20011. Although his career has been marked by controversy, his contributions to critical care medicine continue to be a topic of discussion in the medical community.
There are many studies indicating cancer is actually parasites and that is why anti-parasitics can be beneficial in treating cancer. No one wants to talk about this but thought I would share. Thank you for bringing up this amazing treatment option for people with cancer.
We'd say that cancer acts like a parasite, in contrast to those that claim cancer is caused by parasites. So, yes, we're on the same page as you in your thinking.
"FenBen Labs fenbendazole 222 mg once per day."
What part of a teaspoon is this? My guess is one fifth. 222 is nice number ( https://www.bing.com/search?q=222+is+nice+number&PC=U316&FORM=CHROMN ) and this what the classic dog dewormer has. That 222 mg Joe Tippens used. These days some take double this dose daily. Joe took this 5x per week, iirc.
Found At Amazon That Joe Tippens used >>> "Panacur C Canine Dewormer (Fenbendazole), 4 Gram,Red"
After reading Joe Tippens I got some Panacure that stated on the box that it was made in Austria.
I recently ordered some more Panacure and it stated on the box that it was made in China.
Has there been any testing of the purity of the Chinese made Panacure?
Both times I ordered the Panacure from Amazon.
Hey, checkout Forveda Online Private Limited, Nagpur
You might be interested in how I am curing my dog from cancer with Fenben. https://vaccinatedbyproxy.substack.com/p/how-i-am-curing-my-dog-of-cancer
Thank you so much for your post and details of care! :)
Much love to your doggo!
That is a great outcome!
Excellent!
FYI: FLCCCC on Feb 7 on their Rumble channel broadcasted their weekly update, this one on "Health Care Revolution Conference Recap." And Dr Paul Marik shared an update to one of his slides he had shared at the conference. "Metabolic Interventions to Control Cancer," at 25:40 minute mark: ON THE MEBENDAZOLE (sadly, only 100-200mg) ITEM, IVERMECTIN 12 MG WAS ADDED RIGHT NEXT TO IT, NOW IN TIER 1, AND IN THE TOP 10 AT THAT! Last I looked, his conference slide had not yet been updated to include Ivermectin. BUT in his 12/11/23 update to his Cancer Care book, Ivermectin had been upgraded to Tier 2, and he had commented there (and in the Mebendazole section) that the two would act synergistically together, with one caveat: Ivermectin does not cross the BBB (blood brain barrier) and so would not be helpful for brain cancer. He seems to put Mebendazole/Fenbendazole on par in his hard copy of the book. I hope they're the same, I just ordered a significant amount of Mebendazole from India.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7505114/
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0006291X16317429
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6900471/
While it is true that Ivermectin doesn't cross the BBB in most mammals, it might be worth taking (along with Fenbendazole) for gliomas. A few articles I have read mention the different pathways IVM uses to kill glioma cancer cells.
Thank you, T! :-) Yes, I’ve read about the mechanisms by which IVM works against cancers, and thank you for bringing it to my attention that it appears to somehow work against gliomas—and yet, in these papers you linked to in their describing these mechanisms upon the glioma cell itself in vitro and in vivo, it’s never specified how it gets through the BBB to the glioma in the brain!!… hmmm? And then at the end of the NIH article the authors state: however, because IVM does not cross the BBB the outlook for IVM’s effectiveness against gliomas is not optimistic.
So it’s a mixed bag… but you know what? I have not stopped taking my 12 mg of IVM every day!! along with a mix of Fenben and Meben. Since I have both and have read several research papers on each of them,
I’m using half-and-half mgs of each per day , or alternating days (fenben then meben, totaling 425mg day). Thus covering all my bets to beat down the CSM in my brain… along with a whole boatload of supplements!! Ugh!
The Riggins’ lab at Johns Hopkins did a few parametric studies showing that of all the antiparasitics, fenbendazole penetrated the BBB best.
Yes. We'll have to update our discussion of the Tier I, II and III repurposed drugs.